Download this guidance as a PDF
Back to Professional Standards Framework
Read the Safety Standards
Read the New Rider Standard

Status: ICI best-practice guidance
Applies to: studios, gyms, leisure operators, employers, managers, and organisations delivering indoor cycling
Also suitable for: indoor cycling instructors, ICI members, training providers, and those responsible for group exercise provision
Purpose: To provide practical guidance on studio responsibilities, management duties, policies, virtual sessions, and instructor expectations in indoor cycling

Safe indoor cycling depends on more than the individual instructor.
A well-taught class matters, but studios and operators also have responsibilities. Equipment, maintenance, induction processes, class policies, instructor expectations, late-arrival procedures, virtual provision, incident reporting, and emergency arrangements all affect whether indoor cycling is delivered safely and professionally.
This guidance is intended to help studios, gyms, leisure operators, and employers understand what good indoor cycling provision should include.
It sits alongside the Indoor Cycling Instructor Scope of Practice, ICI Safety Standards for Indoor Cycling Sessions, ICI New Rider Onboarding Standard, and ICI Cadence and Intensity Guidance.

1. Purpose studio and operator guidance

Indoor cycling is often delivered in busy group settings, with riders of mixed ability using fixed-wheel studio bikes.
Even a skilled instructor can be limited by poor systems. If bikes are faulty, new riders are not identified, late arrivals are waved into class without support, virtual sessions are unsupervised, or policies are unclear, rider safety and class quality are affected.
Studios and operators should not rely solely on individual instructors to compensate for weak management procedures.
Good studio management supports:

• rider safety;
• consistent instruction;
• clear instructor expectations;
• better new rider experiences;
• safe equipment use;
• proper maintenance;
• late-arrival management;
• appropriate virtual session provision;
• incident and near-miss learning;
• customer satisfaction and rider retention;
• stronger professional standards.

The aim is not to make indoor cycling difficult to run. When good practice is applied, management is easier and decision-making is reduced as policies and pathways are clear.

2. Studio responsibilities

Studios and operators should provide an environment in which indoor cycling can be delivered safely and professionally.
This includes responsibility for:

• safe and suitable equipment;
• proper bike maintenance;
• clear rider induction processes;
• new rider identification;
• late-arrival policy;
• appropriate class descriptions;
• safe studio layout;
• reasonable instructor visibility of riders;
• emergency procedures;
• incident and near-miss reporting;
• instructor standards;
• clear policies for instructors;
• safe management of virtual and on-demand provision.

Where a studio advertises and delivers indoor cycling, it should have systems in place to support the safe use of the bikes and the safe management of the class environment.

3. Equipment and maintenance

Indoor cycling bikes should be stable, suitable, and maintained.
Studios should have a clear process for checking, reporting, removing, repairing, and returning bikes to use. Instructors and staff should know how to report equipment concerns, and riders should not be expected to use bikes that are known or suspected to be unsafe.
Equipment concerns may include:

• loose or misaligned saddles;
• loose handlebars;
• faulty adjustment mechanisms;
• faulty resistance controls;
• faulty brakes or emergency stops;
• damaged pedals, straps, cages, or cleats;
• unstable bikes;
• faulty displays;
• unusual noises or movement;
• parts that do not hold securely once adjusted.

Where a fault affects safety, the bike should be taken out of use until it has been checked and resolved.
A studio should not treat repeated equipment problems as normal background inconvenience. Faulty bikes affect rider confidence, instructor delivery, and class safety. Repairs should be prompt, and maintenance reviews should be arranged regularly.

4. Studio layout and environment

The studio environment should support safe participation.
Studios should consider:

• safe spacing between bikes;
• clear routes in and out of the room;
• safe access to individual bikes;
• floor condition;
• ventilation;
• temperature;
• lighting;
• sound levels, ideally adjustable from the instructor bike;
• visibility of riders;
• the instructor’s ability to observe the room;
• adaptations for ease of use and for the sensory  impaired – such as screen displays of the session;
• access to first aid or support;
• access for emergency assistance if needed.

Atmosphere is part of indoor cycling, but lighting, sound, layout, and room design should not compromise safety. Riders should be able to see enough to use the bike safely, hear important safety cues, and be observed by the instructor or supervising staff.

5. New rider procedures

Studios should have a clear process for identifying and supporting new riders.
A rider may be new to indoor cycling, new to the studio, new to a specific bike type, returning after a break, or unfamiliar with bike set-up and resistance. Previous attendance elsewhere should not be treated as proof of competence.
Studios should consider:

• asking riders to arrive early for their first session;
• adding shorter introductory sessions for new riders to the class timetable (going through rider setup, and different positions on the bike, and what to expect in class);
• identifying new riders through booking or reception;
• telling instructors when new riders are attending;
• providing first-class information before arrival;
• allowing time for bike set-up guidance;
• ensuring riders know how to use the brake or emergency stop;
• ensuring riders understand resistance control;
• ensuring riders understand that they should remain in control;
• providing a process for riders to raise health or safety concerns.

New rider induction should not depend entirely on the instructor discovering a new rider seconds before the class begins.
This section should be read alongside the ICI New Rider Onboarding Standard.

6. Late-arrival policy

Studios should have a clear late-arrival policy for indoor cycling sessions.
Some studios may choose not to allow riders to join once the session has started. This can be a reasonable safety and class-management decision.
Where late arrivals are allowed, the studio should have a process that allows the rider to join safely. A late rider may have missed bike set-up guidance, brake explanation, resistance guidance, cadence coaching, the warm-up, and important safety information.
A late rider should not simply be waved into the room and expected to join the class at the current intensity.
If a late rider is permitted to join, the studio or instructor should ensure that the rider can:

• set up the bike safely;
• understand the brake or emergency stop;
• understand resistance control;
• warm up appropriately;
• join the session at a suitable intensity;
• avoid jumping straight into high-intensity work.
• If this cannot be done safely, the rider should not join that session.

The late-arrival policy should be understood by reception staff, instructors, managers, and riders. It should not be left to an instructor to negotiate under pressure once the class has started.

7. Instructor standards

Studios should be clear about what they expect from indoor cycling instructors.
Instructor expectations should cover more than attendance numbers, personality, music choice, or rider enthusiasm.
Studios should expect instructors to:

• hold suitable training or qualifications and keep knowledge and skills up to date;
• work within their competence and insurance;
  
• plan safe and purposeful sessions;
• provide clear cadence and intensity guidance;
• coach resistance appropriately;
• include a suitable warm-up and cool-down;
• onboard new riders properly;
• monitor riders during the session;
• intervene when riders appear unsafe or out of control;
• follow studio procedures;
• report equipment faults;
• report incidents and near-misses;
• treat riders professionally and respectfully;
  
• avoid practices that compromise control, stability, safe cadence, suitable resistance, or rider contact with the bike.
  

Instructor standards should be written down, shared, and reviewed. They should not exist only as informal assumptions.
Position statement: Indoor cycling as a specialist discipline

8. Instructor policies and sign-up

Studios should have clear policies for indoor cycling instructors to read and acknowledge.
These may include:

• new rider induction procedure;
• late-arrival policy;
• equipment fault reporting;
• incident and near-miss reporting;
• emergency procedure;
• class safety expectations;
• virtual session procedure;
• music and sound policy;
• cover instructor procedure;
• cleaning and bike reset expectations;
• professional conduct expectations.

Where instructors are expected to follow a studio policy, they should be given access to it and asked to confirm that they understand it.
This does not need to be complicated. A short studio indoor cycling policy can be more useful than a large document nobody reads.
The important point is that instructors should not be left guessing what the studio expects.

Go to the Indoor Cycling Instructor Standards Policy here.

9. Class descriptions and rider information

Preventing loss of control is a core safety responsibility in indoor cycling.
Loss of control may include:

• being pulled by the pedals;
• bouncing excessively;
• being unable to slow down;
• feet losing contact with pedals, straps, or cleats;
• unstable standing work;
• pedalling with too little resistance;
• riding faster than the rider can control;
• being unable to follow instructions safely.

Instructors should programme, cue, and monitor in a way that reduces avoidable risk.
Riders should not be encouraged to value speed, rhythm, choreography, or keeping up with the group above the basics of bike control.
Where a rider appears out of control, the instructor should intervene. This may include asking the rider to slow down, add suitable resistance, sit down, take recovery, or stop.
Loss of control should not be treated as normal, amusing, inevitable, or solely the rider’s responsibility.

10. Cadence and intensity standards

Studios should support clear expectations around cadence and intensity in order to greatly reduce rider injury risk.
ICI recommends the following cadence ranges as best practice for general indoor cycling instruction:
Seated riding: 60–110 RPM
Standing or out-of-saddle riding: 60–85 RPM
Studios should avoid encouraging class styles, instructor expectations, or brand formats that routinely push riders outside safe and controlled cadence ranges.
Studios should also expect instructors to teach intensity properly. Good intensity guidance may use power, FTP zones, rate of perceived exertion, heart rate, talk-test guidance, clear descriptive coaching, interval structure, and recovery cues.
Poor intensity guidance includes relying only on vague instructions such as 'turn it up', 'one more turn', 'add a bit', or numbered gear levels that are not meaningful across the bikes being used.
This section should be read alongside the ICI Cadence and Intensity Guidance.

11. Discouraged or unsuitable riding practices

Studios should consider whether the movements and class formats they permit support safe, controlled indoor cycling.
Instructors should not be expected or encouraged to programme, demonstrate, or lead movements that compromise control, stability, effective resistance, safe cadence, or the rider’s ability to maintain proper contact with the bike.
Practices requiring particular caution include:

• high-speed standing work;
• riding with no hands or unnecessarily reduced hand contact;
• bike press-ups or upper-body exercises while pedalling;
• tap-backs;
• isolations;
• choreography that interferes with cycling control;
• movements that encourage insufficient resistance;
• movements that make it harder to stop safely.

Where a studio permits rhythm-based or choreography-based indoor cycling, it should still ensure that safety principles are followed. Choreography should not override control, resistance, cadence, posture, or rider safety.
This section should be read alongside the ICI Safety Standards for Indoor Cycling Sessions.

12. Virtual and on-demand indoor cycling sessions

Virtual and on-demand indoor cycling provision requires specific management attention.
Showing a video is not a substitute for rider supervision.
A video instructor cannot check an individual rider’s bike set-up, confirm that they understand the brake, monitor resistance use, observe loss of control, respond to a rider feeling unwell, or intervene when a rider is riding unsafely.
Where a studio or facility provides virtual or on-demand indoor cycling sessions, the operator should ensure that riders know how to:

• set up the bike;
• use the brake or emergency stop;
• increase and decrease resistance;
• select appropriate resistance;
• understand cadence or foot speed;
• warm up properly;
• control intensity;
• stop safely;
• get help if something goes wrong.

Supervision should be provided by someone competent to recognise and respond to obvious safety issues. This does not mean the person must deliver the class, but they should know enough to identify basic problems and take appropriate action.
Supervision should not consist merely of someone passing through the room occasionally or looking in without the knowledge or responsibility to respond.
Virtual provision should not be used as a way to remove basic rider care or reduce indoor cycling to unsupervised bike use with a screen.

13. Supervision of virtual sessions

Where virtual sessions are run in a studio environment, studios should consider:

• whether riders are new or experienced;
• whether riders know the bike type;
• whether a staff member is present and competent;
• how riders are briefed before the session;
• how bike set-up is checked or supported;
• how riders know what to do if they feel unwell;
• how equipment faults are reported;
• how incidents are recorded;
• whether the room is visible and accessible;
• whether the session content is appropriate for the riders attending.

A virtual class may still be structured, useful, and enjoyable. However, the management system around it must be suitable.
The fact that the instructor is on screen does not remove the studio’s responsibility for the riders using its space and equipment.

14. Emergency procedures

Studios should have clear emergency procedures for indoor cycling sessions.
Instructors and relevant staff should know:

• how to summon help;
• where first aid support is located;
• what to do if a rider feels unwell;
• what to do if a rider falls or loses control;
• how to respond to a bike fault during class;
• how to stop or pause a class if needed;
• how to evacuate the studio;
• how to report an incident;
• who to notify after a concern.

Riders should also be told what to do if they feel unwell, unsafe, or unable to continue.
Instructors should be made aware of safety procedures at the outset of their contract with the studio, and be provided with periodic reminders and/or training when required.

15. Incident and near-miss reporting

Studios should have a process for reporting incidents and near-misses.
This should include more than serious injuries. It should also include events and concerns that indicate risk.
Examples may include:

• a rider losing control of the pedals;
• a rider nearly falling;
• feet coming out of straps or cleats;
• a bike fault during class;
• a rider feeling faint or unwell;
• a late rider being unable to join safely;
• confusion around braking or resistance;
• repeated unsafe riding;
• unsafe choreography causing instability;
• equipment problems;
• a rider reporting pain or safety concerns.

Recording and reviewing near-misses helps studios identify patterns before a more serious incident occurs.
This section should be read alongside the ICI Incident and Near-Miss Reporting Guidance.

16. Supporting instructors who raise concerns

Studios should support instructors who raise reasonable safety concerns.
An instructor should not be pressured to teach in a way they believe is unsafe, ignore faulty equipment, admit late riders without proper onboarding, run unsuitable class formats, or use practices that compromise rider control.
Where instructors raise concerns, studios should have a constructive process for reviewing them.
Safety concerns should not be dismissed because a class is popular, a format is fashionable, or riders appear to enjoy it.

17. Cover instructors and freelance instructors

Studios should ensure that cover instructors and freelance instructors understand the studio’s indoor cycling procedures.
This may include:

• bike type and set-up;
• emergency stop and resistance systems;
• studio layout;
• late-arrival policy;
• new rider process;
• incident reporting;
• equipment fault reporting;
• virtual provision;
• class descriptions;
• local emergency procedures.

A cover instructor should not arrive with no meaningful information about the studio, the bikes, or the expected procedures.
A short induction document or checklist can make cover teaching safer and more consistent.

18. Training, CPD, and instructor development

Studios should encourage indoor cycling instructors to maintain and develop their knowledge.
Indoor cycling instruction changes over time. Equipment, class formats, rider expectations, technology, and safety understanding all develop.
Studios should consider how they support:

• initial instructor training – all instructors should receive industry-recognised entry-level training as a minimum;
• studio-specific induction;
• ongoing CPD;
• peer observation – this can be as simple as allowing instructors to take free places in their peers’ classes;
• class review – a regular review to ensure best practice is employed and studio policy is adhere to;
• feedback;
• professional updates;
• understanding of cadence, resistance, and intensity;
• new rider support;
• safe management of mixed ability groups.

Instructor development should not focus only on performance, entertainment, or attendance. It should also include safety, clarity, coaching quality, and professional judgement.

19. Policy review

Studio policies should be reviewed periodically.
This is particularly important after:

• an incident;
• a near-miss;
• equipment changes;
• new bike installation;
• a change in class format;
• introduction of virtual provision;
• staff turnover;
• repeated rider concerns;
• changes to instructor expectations.

Policies should remain practical and usable. A policy that exists but is not understood, followed, or reviewed is unlikely to support good practice.

20. Relationship to other ICI standards

This guidance is part of the wider ICI Professional Standards Framework.
It should be read alongside:
Indoor Cycling Instructor Scope of Practice
ICI Safety Standards for Indoor Cycling Sessions
ICI Cadence and Intensity Guidance
ICI New Rider Onboarding Standard
Indoor Cycling: What Riders Should Expect
ICI Incident and Near-Miss Reporting Guidance
Together, these documents support safer, clearer, and more professional indoor cycling practice.

Next in the framework
Incident and Near-Miss Reporting Guidance
Code of Professional Conduct
Indoor Cycling: What Riders Should Expect