Position statements set out the Indoor Cycling Institute’s considered views on specific aspects of indoor cycling practice, education and professionalism.
They are intended to provide clarity, context and guidance where practice is variable, evolving or commonly misunderstood.
Position statements do not function as rules or regulation. They are offered as reference points to support professional judgement, discussion and development.
They are intended to provide clarity, context and guidance where practice is variable, evolving or commonly misunderstood.
Position statements do not function as rules or regulation. They are offered as reference points to support professional judgement, discussion and development.
How position statements are used
Position statements may be used by instructors, venues and employers to:
- Better understand the Institute’s perspective on a given topic
- Support reflective practice and professional discussion
- Inform education, session design or decision-making
- Provide context where guidance or standards are interpreted differently
Scope and limits
Position statements are not exhaustive and do not attempt to address every possible context or scenario.
They do not replace professional judgement, employer policies, legal requirements or local procedures.
The Institute recognises that indoor cycling is delivered across diverse environments and that responsible practice requires context-sensitive decision-making.
They do not replace professional judgement, employer policies, legal requirements or local procedures.
The Institute recognises that indoor cycling is delivered across diverse environments and that responsible practice requires context-sensitive decision-making.
Current position statements
The following position statements are currently published by the Indoor Cycling Institute:
Position statements allow the Institute to contribute thoughtfully to the development of indoor cycling without resorting to prescription or control.
