Professional standards
The responsibilities of indoor cycling instructors and the expectations placed on those representing ICI.
Active Roster
Media
Sponsors
What instructors should know, what studios should expect, and how to recognise sound practice in an indoor cycling class.
Teaching indoor cycling involves more than leading a workout. Instructors make decisions about bike set-up, cadence, resistance, effort, recovery and the riders in front of them. Those decisions require technical knowledge and the ability to recognise when something needs to change.
ICI sets out those responsibilities here so that instructors can evaluate their teaching, and studios can make informed decisions about the people delivering their classes.
The eight standards are published in full below. Open any heading to read it.
ICI publishes three kinds of professional reference. The standards describe expected practice; guidance helps instructors and operators apply it; and position statements explain ICI’s approach to specific, sometimes disputed, issues.
The responsibilities of indoor cycling instructors and the expectations placed on those representing ICI.
Advice for making sound decisions when bikes, rider experience, class formats and circumstances differ.
ICI’s published views on subjects including cadence, choreography, music, virtual instruction and certification.
These eight documents explain the practice ICI expects of its recognised instructors. Studios, employers and other instructors can also use them as a reference.
An indoor cycling instructor is responsible for planning, delivering and managing safe, effective and purposeful indoor cycling sessions. The role is more than leading exercise to music: the instructor is managing riders on fixed indoor cycles, where cadence, resistance, position, bike set-up, intensity and rider control all affect safety and effectiveness.
Instructors should plan sessions with a clear purpose and suitable structure, including warm-up, work, recovery and cool-down. They should give clear guidance on bike set-up, safe use of the bike, braking, cadence, resistance, riding position, intensity and recovery, and explain what riders should do if they feel unwell or unable to continue safely.
Riders may choose how hard they work within appropriate guidance, but core safety decisions should not simply be transferred to the rider. The instructor remains responsible for giving safe and effective instructions and for responding when a rider appears unsafe, confused or out of control.
ICI recommends 60–110 RPM for seated riding and 60–85 RPM for standing or out-of-saddle riding as best-practice ranges for general indoor cycling. Cadence outside these ranges should not be routine programming. Where an instructor has a defensible reason to work outside them, rider control remains the priority.
Resistance is both a training and safety variable. Riders should use enough resistance to remain stable, controlled and connected to the pedals. Instructors should not encourage insufficient resistance, particularly at higher cadence or out of the saddle.
New riders should receive appropriate onboarding, including bike set-up, braking, resistance control and basic guidance on cadence, intensity and what to do if something feels wrong. Previous attendance elsewhere should not automatically be treated as proof that a rider understands the bike or safe indoor cycling technique.
If late arrivals are permitted, they must still be able to set up safely, understand the controls, warm up and join at an appropriate intensity. If that cannot be done safely, they should not join that session.
Loss of control may include excessive bouncing, being pulled by the pedals, inability to slow down, insufficient resistance, loss of pedal contact or instability out of the saddle. Instructors should intervene rather than treating these signs as normal. Appropriate action may include asking the rider to slow down, add resistance, sit down, recover or stop.
Movements should allow riders to remain stable, controlled and properly connected to the bike. Practices that compromise control, effective resistance, safe cadence or contact with the bike should not be programmed simply because they are popular or entertaining.
Instructors should work within their training, competence, insurance and role. They should not diagnose medical conditions, provide clinical advice or work beyond their professional remit unless separately qualified to do so. Where necessary, the rider should be referred to an appropriate professional or venue process.
Professional conduct is part of safe and effective instruction. Honesty, judgement, respect and clear communication are as important as technical competence.
Work within your training, competence, insurance and professional role. Take responsibility for the instructions you give and the decisions you make.
Treat riders as individuals and give proper regard to their safety, dignity and circumstances.
Describe your training, certification, experience and professional status accurately.
Maintain appropriate boundaries with riders, students, colleagues and other people with whom you work.
Communicate in a way that is appropriate to a professional fitness environment.
Do not ignore a genuine safety concern simply because addressing it is awkward or inconvenient.
Initial training is a starting point. Maintain and develop the knowledge needed for the work you continue to undertake.
Be prepared to take responsibility for your professional decisions and for the way you represent your training and experience.
Any indoor cycling instructor can read the full Code and make an annual commitment to work in accordance with it. Where a register record is available, current commitment status and the date last committed can be shown publicly.
A safe indoor cycling session is not simply a sequence of songs, efforts or movements. It should be structured so riders can remain in control, understand what is required and work at an appropriate intensity.
Instructors should be familiar with the bikes, studio layout, emergency arrangements and venue procedures. Obvious equipment problems should be reported. New riders should be identified and given suitable onboarding before the session progresses beyond a safe point for them to join.
Riders should receive enough guidance to use the bike safely, including saddle and handlebar adjustment, secure settings, resistance control and the brake or emergency stop. Set-up should be checked as far as is realistic in the class environment.
The warm-up should prepare riders progressively for the demands of the session. The cool-down should reduce intensity appropriately rather than ending abruptly after demanding work. Neither should be treated as expendable simply because class time is limited.
For general indoor cycling, ICI recommends 60–110 RPM seated and 60–85 RPM standing. Riders should not be encouraged to chase speed at the expense of resistance, stability or control. Where bikes do not display cadence, instructors should still coach foot speed using clear cues, demonstration, music tempo or other appropriate methods.
Resistance must be sufficient for control and appropriate to the intended work. Intensity should be taught rather than left to guesswork. Useful methods include power or FTP zones, RPE, heart rate, talk-test guidance and clear descriptive coaching. Vague cues such as 'turn it up' can support clear coaching, but should not replace it.
Seated and standing work should be used with appropriate cadence and resistance. Riders should not be placed out of the saddle without enough load to remain stable. Transitions should be coached clearly enough for riders to change position without losing control.
Very high-intensity work should be short, purposeful and supported by adequate recovery. A sprint is not simply fast pedalling. It requires suitable resistance, controlled cadence and an intensity appropriate to a genuine maximal effort. Riders who cannot perform the effort safely should be given a clear alternative.
Instructors should avoid movements that compromise control or turn the bike into equipment for unrelated upper-body exercise. Particular caution is required with high-speed standing work, riding with unnecessarily reduced hand contact, press-ups on the bike, tap-backs, isolations and choreography that interferes with stable cycling technique.
Instructors should watch the room. Signs such as bouncing, uncontrolled cadence, feet losing contact, instability, obvious confusion or a rider appearing faint or distressed require attention. Intervention may be directed to the whole class or to an individual and may include slowing down, changing resistance, sitting, recovering or stopping.
Riders should be able to reduce intensity, remain seated, recover or stop when needed. Rider choice is not, however, a substitute for safe programming. An instructor should not programme unsuitable work and then place all responsibility for safety on the rider.
Injuries, loss of control, pedal or cleat problems, equipment faults, faintness and repeated unsafe patterns should be taken seriously. Near-misses can reveal weaknesses before somebody is hurt and should be recorded where appropriate.
Not every class, rider group or bike system is identical. Instructors should apply the standards sensibly while keeping the underlying principles clear: riders should be coached in a way that supports control, purpose, effectiveness and safety.
Cadence describes how quickly the pedals turn. Intensity describes the demand of the work. Resistance, cadence, riding position and duration interact to create that demand, so they should be programmed together rather than treated as separate variables.
ICI recommends 60–110 RPM for seated riding and 60–85 RPM for standing or out-of-saddle riding. These are best-practice ranges for general indoor cycling. Work outside them should not be routine and should have a clear rationale without compromising rider control.
Seated riding permits a wider cadence range because the saddle provides additional support. Standing work requires enough resistance and a controlled cadence to support stability. Riders should not be encouraged to stand at a speed that makes them unstable or dependent on the handlebars for control.
Riders should understand how hard they are meant to work and why. Depending on the session and equipment, intensity may be taught using power or FTP zones, RPE, heart rate, talk test or specific descriptive cues. An instructor should be able to explain the intended effort in more than one way where necessary.
RPE is useful because it does not depend on bike technology. Descriptive cues such as 'steady and sustainable', 'hard but repeatable' or 'very hard and short' can add useful context, particularly when linked to an RPE target and the duration of the effort.
Heart rate can help riders understand cardiovascular response but is influenced by factors including fatigue, temperature, hydration, stress, medication and caffeine. Power and FTP-based guidance can provide greater precision where reliable data are available and the instructor understands how to use them.
Depending on the effort, riders may also need resistance guidance, recovery information, the purpose of the interval and an easier option.
Resistance should be described in a way that riders can apply to themselves. Fixed gear numbers, fixed knob turns or fixed watt targets for a mixed group are generally unsuitable because bikes and riders differ. Useful guidance describes the intended load, effort and effect while preserving control.
High cadence with insufficient resistance can lead to bouncing and loss of control. Excessive resistance can prevent smooth pedalling or appropriate posture. Recovery should reduce demand while retaining smooth, controlled riding. Position changes should be accompanied by suitable changes to cadence, resistance and intensity expectations.
New riders may not understand RPM, watts, FTP, threshold or RPE. Technical terms should therefore be explained in plain language. They should understand that faster is not automatically better and that they may slow down, remain seated, recover or stop.
Instructors should programme responsibly, cue clearly, educate riders, monitor the room and intervene where somebody appears unsafe or out of control. Choices should be technically defensible rather than based only on habit, imitation, music or class popularity.
New riders should not be expected to work out indoor cycling by watching everybody else. They need enough information to set up the bike, control it and make sensible decisions during the session.
Studios and instructors should have a practical way of identifying people who are new to indoor cycling, new to the venue or unfamiliar with the bike being used. A rider who has attended classes elsewhere may still need support.
Onboarding should cover the main adjustments needed for a safe and workable riding position. Riders should know how to secure settings and should be encouraged to ask for help if something feels wrong.
Before the class becomes demanding, a new rider should understand how to increase and decrease resistance and how to slow or stop the pedals using the bike's braking system.
New riders should be told that faster is not automatically better. Riders should pedal smoothly and remain in control rather than try to match the group at any cost. Where cadence is displayed, the instructor should explain what the numbers mean. Where it is not, foot speed should still be coached clearly.
New riders should understand that they control their own effort within the instructor's safety guidance. They may work at a lower intensity, remain seated, take recovery, reduce excessive load, add resistance if they are bouncing, slow down or stop.
A rider should not be pressured to ride out of the saddle. Standing requires suitable resistance, control and confidence. Remaining seated is an acceptable option.
Riders should know that pain, dizziness, unusual breathlessness, instability or inability to control the bike are reasons to reduce effort or stop and seek help. The instructor is not expected to diagnose the cause.
A late rider still needs appropriate onboarding and warm-up. If the class has progressed to a point where this cannot be provided safely, the rider should not join that session.
Onboarding works best when the venue supports it through booking information, reception processes, class descriptions and sufficient time before the session. It should not depend entirely on an instructor discovering a new rider after the class has started.
Indoor cycling safety should not depend on waiting for an injury. Near-misses and repeated concerns can reveal problems with equipment, onboarding, class design, studio procedure or instruction before somebody is harmed.
An incident may include a fall, injury, rider becoming unwell, loss of pedal control, a foot coming out of a pedal or cleat, equipment failure, inability to stop safely, first-aid involvement or another event that affects rider safety.
A near-miss is an event where harm did not occur but reasonably could have. Examples include a rider nearly falling, being pulled by the pedals but recovering, a saddle moving during class, repeated bouncing from insufficient resistance or confusion about the brake.
Patterns matter. Repeated problems with the same bike, frequent confusion about set-up, regular late-arrival problems, recurring loss of control or repeated unsafe class practices should be reviewed even when each individual event appears minor.
Loose saddles or handlebars, faulty brakes or resistance controls, damaged pedals or straps, unstable bikes, unusual movement or settings that do not hold should be reported. A bike with a safety-critical fault should be taken out of use until checked.
Records should be factual, proportionate and free from blame or unnecessary personal detail. Relevant data protection, safeguarding, accident-reporting and health-and-safety procedures still apply.
Immediate action comes first. Reporting afterwards does not replace helping a rider who is unsafe or unwell. Instructors should know the venue's reporting process and raise concerns where no clear process exists.
Reporting should be straightforward enough to be used. Studios should review reports, act on equipment or procedural problems and look for recurring patterns rather than treating each event in isolation.
Good instruction can be undermined by poor systems. Faulty bikes, unclear policies, weak onboarding, unsuitable class formats or poor management of late arrivals can make it difficult for even a competent instructor to deliver a safe session.
Bikes should be inspected and maintained, with a clear way to report faults and remove unsafe equipment from use. Instructors should know what to do if a problem is found immediately before or during a class.
Studios should use appropriately trained instructors and should understand what their indoor cycling training actually covers. A general fitness background does not automatically provide specialist indoor cycling competence.
Studios should not require class styles that routinely push riders beyond controlled cadence or encourage insufficient resistance. ICI's general best-practice ranges are 60–110 RPM seated and 60–85 RPM standing. Intensity should be coached through meaningful methods rather than arbitrary bike settings or vague pressure to work harder.
Commercial style does not override safety. Rhythm or choreography-based classes should still preserve control, suitable resistance, safe cadence and appropriate contact with the bike. High-speed standing work, no-hands riding, bike press-ups, tap-backs, isolations and other movements that interfere with stable cycling require particular scrutiny.
Booking and reception systems should help identify riders who need support. Where late arrivals are permitted, the studio should have a workable process that still allows safe set-up, briefing and warm-up.
Where sessions are delivered without an instructor physically present, the studio should consider how riders receive bike set-up information, safety guidance, emergency information and support. A screen does not remove the operator's responsibilities for the environment and equipment.
Instructors should be able to raise genuine safety concerns without pressure to ignore faulty equipment, admit riders unsafely or teach practices they reasonably believe compromise rider control.
Policies should be reviewed after incidents, near-misses, equipment changes, new class formats, repeated rider concerns or other changes that expose weaknesses. Policies should remain practical enough to be understood and used.
You do not need to be an indoor cycling expert to expect a class to be safe, understandable and professionally taught.
If you are new, you should be able to get help with the bike and understand the main controls before the class becomes demanding. You should know how to adjust resistance and how to stop the pedals safely.
You should receive enough guidance to achieve a workable set-up and know how to ask for help. You should not be expected simply to copy the person next to you.
The instructor should give meaningful guidance about how fast to pedal and how much resistance to use. Faster is not automatically better. If you are bouncing or being pulled by the pedals, you may need to slow down or add resistance.
You should have a reasonable idea of how hard you are meant to be working. This might be explained using RPE, heart rate, power, talk test or plain-language effort descriptions. You should also understand how long harder work will last and when recovery is coming.
You should be able to remain seated, reduce intensity, take recovery or stop when necessary. A good instructor can provide alternatives without treating them as failure.
You should not feel pressured to perform movements that make you unstable or unable to control the bike. Choreography should not take priority over safe cycling technique.
Take pain, dizziness, unusual breathlessness, confusion or loss of control seriously. Reduce intensity or stop and ask for help. The instructor should respond sensibly, although they are not there to diagnose a medical problem.
A challenging class does not need to feel chaotic. You should understand what you are being asked to do, how hard you are meant to work, how fast you are meant to pedal and what to do if the prescribed work is not right for you that day.
Our ten position statements address questions that regularly arise in indoor cycling, from safe cadence to the use of choreography and virtual classes.
Select a topic to read ICI’s full statement on the Position Statements page.
Explore position statements →An instructor can follow a session plan and still miss what is happening in the room. Watch how riders respond, listen to questions and concerns, and change the instruction when necessary.
Professional judgement also requires knowing when a concern falls outside your competence and when to seek help.
Explain what a session or coaching choice is intended to achieve.
Look for signs that the intended work is unsuitable, unclear or becoming unsafe.
A session plan does not take precedence over what is happening in the room.
Work within your competence and seek appropriate support when required.
Instructors, studios and riders need different things from these documents. The examples below show where to start.
Use the standards to:
Use the standards to:
Use the standards to:
These are professional references, not a substitute for sound decision-making in the studio.
ICI uses the standards in instructor training, CPD and professional recognition. Employers can use them when recruiting and reviewing instructors; instructors can use them to identify gaps in their own practice.
Relevant legislation, safeguarding requirements, insurance conditions, manufacturers’ instructions and venue procedures still apply.
Riders experience these standards through clear instruction, well-chosen efforts, appropriate adaptations and an instructor who pays attention.